Hello my Dear Friend!

Kinoz TD Was Here !



We've been pointing out that one of the big reasons why the MPAA/RIAA and others

failed in their efforts to rush through SOPA/PIPA was that they have been totally and

completely tone deaf to what's happening online. And it appears that's continuing. The LA Times had a

bizarre article over the weekend, where people were suggesting that the MPAA needed to "do a lot of test

messaging," to see what would work in convincing the public that censoring the internet is a good thing.

Test messaging? Seriously?!? They still seem to think that this is about a lobbying or PR campaign, rather

than actually engaging and hearing what people have to say.



Even more ridiculous is the new talking point that both the MPAA and

the RIAA are apparently "test messaging" currently. And it's that they --

who own all of the major media outlets around -- are somehow at a disadvantage in communicating their

views to the public. I'm not kidding. In that article above, Chris Dodd from the MPAA is quoted as saying:

"You've got an opponent who has the capacity to reach millions of people with a click of a mouse and

there's no fact-checker. They can say whatever they want."

Yup, that's the new MPAA talking point: "if only you moron internet kids couldn't actually say what

you want!" Does anyone actually brief Dodd about how best not to make it totally

transparent that he wants to censor the internet?



But the RIAA is passing along the exact same message. Dodd's counterpart at the RIAA,

Cary Sherman, is quoted as saying basically the same thing in the NY Times:

“It’s very difficult to counter the misinformation when the disseminators also own the platform.”

First of all, this is ridiculous on all sorts of levels. Was it true that some of those

against the bill weren't completely up on the facts? Yes. But, lots of us were clear on our

facts, cited specific language in the bill, and were quick to correct those who stated things that were incorrect.



But much more to the point: we're talking about all of the major media companies in the

world who were in support of this thing, and they're seriously claiming that they didn't have

the means to get their message out? Who the hell do they think they're fooling? They own all

the major TV networks, all the cable news networks, the majority of top magazines,

a bunch of top radio stations... and most of those media outlets refused to give critics of

these bills the time of day. But suddenly they're claiming they couldn't get their message out? Give me a break.



Even worse, let's compare the two platforms: SOPA/PIPA supporters completely own TV.

But TV is a broadcast medium. They could put on whatever propaganda they wanted,

and there'd be no way to guarantee a right to a response on TV. The internet, however,

is a communications medium, where anyone can take part. So unlike the reverse situation,

the supporters of the bill had every opportunity to counter the claims of people online

if they felt they were being misrepresented. The real problem was that, for the most part,

they weren't being misrepresented. The problem was that people were saying what the bill would actually do,

and Hollywood wanted people to focus on what they wanted people to believe the bill would really do. Reality,

it seems, has a strong anti-Hollywood bias.

| T3D MRS |T3D | T3D SEC | T3D JR |T3D MR | AHF | Pintu Rintangan TD | Acap Mystyle | MrHelper | MrAlly | -=[W]an7=- | Master Lord | MrsNisz | MrWanted | MrAkaun Dibuang | MrAdios | MrAdan |Vanilla Pink | Seth Erry |WebHunter MyHex | Kecix Paronoia | DragonForce | MyHex | RileksCrew |H3xoRcR3w |Medic HC | RainSeven |Noobster HC |Crovot HC |Dx HC | Bell |And all Malaysian Hacker |

Enjoy!